We cut mature ecosystem services and replace them with saplings that do not survive compacted soil.
A visible paradox in many Italian cities: large trees are cut down and small specimens are planted that do not survive heatwaves, soil compaction or lack of maintenance.
Safety is sometimes invoked — rightly — but without management plans that value existing heritage.
In brief
- Safety yes — but with tree assessment and alternatives to total removal.
- Root ball and irrigation decide survival.
- A mature tree = decades of shade and biodiversity not recovered in three years.
What to ask local authorities
Independent tree assessments, correct pruning instead of blanket felling, adequate soil pits and irrigation in early years: standards that reduce “disposable green”.
Pianta.land promotes trees followed over time: the logic is opposite to symbolic planting without care.
"Disposable green" suits those who want visible worksites, not residents. Ask for five-year maintenance and survival plans for new plantings.
- Ask for a register of interventions and planned species before felling.
- Check replacements are not only ornamental but suited to urban microclimate.
- Join adoptions and civic monitoring of neighbourhood trees.
Why it matters locally and for Pianta.land
Safety is sometimes invoked — rightly — but without management plans that value existing heritage.
On Pianta.land, following a wellness tree on visitable land is the most concrete way to link outreach and territory.
Frequently asked questions
Are old trees always dangerous?
No: they need monitoring. Felling should be the last option when safety alternatives do not exist.
How do you verify if felling is necessary?
Ask for an arboricultural report and safety options (cables, selective pruning). Total removal should be the last documented choice.
A Pianta.land article, related to outreach on EYW A Divulgazione.